Articles related to design concepts or application of GD&T to engineering prints
In the Question Line Video below, Jason answers a student’s question regarding whether a feature of size can be designed to both Maximum Material Condition (MMC) and Least Material Condition (LMC) boundary constraints.
Is it possible to control multiple identical profiles by including a multiplier with the feature control frame? In the video below, Jason reviews a drawing with 2 irregularly shaped identical cutouts to answer this question.
Can you use the MMC modifier and still ensure a minimum wall thickness? To answer this question, we are going to look at a drawing of a flywheel and compare how using the MMC modifier or the LMC modifier affects the minimum wall thickness.
Why doesn't a feature of size that is indicated as a datum feature need to be located? In this article and corresponding question line video, we look at two drawing examples to illustrate why datum features are not located.
If I specify a hole in a practically thin feature, such as a piece of sheet metal, is this still considered a cylindrical datum? Is this a poor choice of datum? In this article, we look at an example to help us answer these questions.
How can datums be perfectly perpendicular to each other when the features themselves are likely imperfect? The feature axis and the datum axis derived from the feature are found in two different ways, using the Unrelated Actual Mating Envelope and the Related Actual Mating Envelope.
We often see a pattern of holes indicated as a datum feature in a GD&T drawing. How do we simulate this to create our datum reference frame?
Is it allowable to have identical Virtual Conditions for mating boss and bore features? Learn how to calculate and compare Virtual Conditions of mating features to understand the potential clearance between the assembled parts.
Can a single point (without clocking) be used as a secondary datum in a feature control frame? To answer this question, we first need to determine what datum feature is being represented by this single point. Read on to discover the answer to this commonly asked question from our GD&T students.
When applying position tolerances to countersunk fixed fastener assembly conditions, our design must not only ensure assembly, but also that the fastener head sits flush or below the surface of the part. We are able to determine the values required to achieve this by using the fixed fastener equation.
Knurling is a process used to create a pattern on the surface of a material by displacing or deforming the surface.
Tolerance stacks can be a nightmare. However, when using GD&T rather than coordinate dimensioning, tolerance stack-ups within a part can be avoided.
This 3-part series is great for designers or anyone who may be applying things to an engineering drawing. In this series, we’ll review the top 3 things that manufacturing and quality departments wish you knew...
To determine when to use Profile of a Surface or Coordinate Dimensioning, let’s first look at what the 2009 ASME Y14.5 Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing Standard tells us. Paragraph 2.1.1 was revised to emphasize/encourage the...
Properly defining, qualifying, and referencing datum features is essential to ensure that parts are properly manufactured and inspected. To begin exploring proper use of datum features, it is helpful if we first review definitions and...
In this video, we respond to a question asking how using Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing can affect internal or vendor-provided manufacturing and inspection processes. It is important to remember that the goal of GD&T is...
There are many great reasons why engineers & designers benefit from knowledge of Geometric Dimensioning & Tolerancing (GD&T). But today, we want to share with you just one reason that is particularly interesting. Even though...
How do you create a quality design, but at the same time, keep cost and ease of production in mind? In this article we will examine three key areas in designing for manufacturability and give...